Line in the sand

23 July 2016
Comments Off on Line in the sand

Line in the sand
There is a time when enough is enough. There is a time when you wake up and realize, those you relied on and paid taxes to protect you and protect your freedom, have not only run away from their duties, but hijacked your money and spent it on exactly what you paid them to protect you from. This is something that no sane person can deny and yet we continue to think anything we do peacefully will change this? One can only hope so.
At times I like to think that there are many that care enough for us to join the our peaceful pursuits but then I realize, not only do many of them feel like we do, what is worse is when they understand it and believe it but do nothing because they don’t know what to do. 
We are in deep trouble when we have a government that is divided into those that still give a crap but don’t know what to do and the other that have intentionally have hijacked our country. We are all frantic for solutions and from the look of things we will suffer a horrific fate if we don’t find one soon. I for one, will tell you, after years of pondering my position, I have drawn my line in the sand and hope you have to. In a strange way, publicly declaring that I have found that line is almost peaceful because I now know what line I will not tolerate to be crossed. 
If you are in government and see me as the enemy, I’m sorry you feel that way and perhaps you should pull the plank from your own eye and really ponder what purpose you serve as you live and breathe.
If you are in government and understand what we face as I do, I ask you to really think about what laws and policies you enforce and ask yourself if they promote liberty or strip it and ask yourself if you really have the authority to object to certain laws you know are wrong. You do have that lawful authority like we all do, the question is, when will you use it? Will you exercise your righteous dominion to stand and protect brothers like me or will you use your totalitarian unlawful government seemingly boundless power to the detriment of those in the present and future generations?
The constitution was created to control government and yet, today we see people in government that say they honor their oath as they enforce any and all rules, policies and regulations created by any and every branch of government and even those created by those not in government that do nothing but destroy our rights! Have you asked once, how the hell that makes any sense? How can agencies say they adhere to their oath and know nothing of that oath and not even question any idea of limitations on authority? 
I am confident in posting this comment because I have done my homework, I understand the consequences and I understand what must be done. I have made many attempts to bring people together for a common purpose and people, in their independence all have their own ideas on what they will do, on their own. It is for this reason we will lose, not because you won’t follow me, I could care less who leads as long as he is principled and consistent grounded in Gods word and knowledgeable on the freedom principles of our Founders with the goal of freedom, liberty and justice for all, but do you prefer to go it alone?
I believe it was Jefferson and others that stated that if we don’t hang together, we will surely hang separately, so if you stand alone and think your way is the best but find you have no followers, perhaps it isn’t, if you stand alone anyway, you have chosen to allow your brothers to hang.
The times we face are of the utmost urgency, this country is in eminent peril if we are not educated and we fail to act. If you are not living each moment these days as if it will be your last and consequently living as if it is the last day your children will enjoy freedom, you really have become a liability and hindrance and, well, part of the enemies plan to succeed.
I see hundreds of people every month, they all complain about how screwed up government is and are super emotional about it but, ironically, the most common excuse they don’t get involved is that they are too busy. Let me get this straight, you hear that a Tsunami is coming and you take time to prepare? Oh, you will if it is weather related by the word of an unreliable weatherman but you will remain inactive when history doesn’t lie? 
In this free country, I will boldly proclaim, I am fearful of my government. I am fearful from the moment I wake up until I go to bed. I fear the lawless expansion of power, and most of all I fear the loss of any lawful remedy seeking justice against tyranny. I fear the breach of the walls of our system of checks and balances and separations of power and I fear that those charged with protecting us have cowered in fear or have become the enemy, one, to me, being no different than the other. As I say I am fearful, please do not mistake my fear meaning I would cower in fear in a corner, or would be afraid to stand alone, NO! The fear I possess is the fear of my children living in bondage at the hands of my government knowing I didn’t do as much as I could have while I had the chance.
What is the point of this post? I think I just wanted to reach out to my friends, those that are yet to be my friends and those I may affect by what I do and in some small way something I have said or written in my years of activism and share a few thoughts because I know many of you agree and feel just like I do. I guess I’m just here to say, if you are awake, you are not alone, I am here with you as painful as it may be to see what we see and knowing what we know.
The other part of this message I guess was to hopefully be entered (unlawfully, like I have a choice at the moment) into my NSA data backpack, along with every call, text and picture I have ever taken, written about, verbally commented on that will follow me forever like a slave in a totalitarian state, promoted “in the name of safety” that, if history repeats itself, will lead to some form of indefinite detainment and ultimately genocide by that same government that sold us safety and security.
Freedom? Here? Yeah right, not now but if we act and act soon, diligently, tirelessly, and “collectively,” maybe.
You action or inaction will directly affect the future of this nation and the future not only of your children but your children’s children and theirs in perpetuity. 
Do you want to be written in the history books or in the Book of Life, as someone that was better to have tied a millstone around the neck of future generations? 
Not me.

America, the Conundrum

1 July 2016
Comments Off on America, the Conundrum

I saw this on an email the other day and thought I would post it because sometimes things like this can explain something much quicker and clearer than I could by attempting to exlain it myself. For the last few years, I have referred to these things as America- The epitome of irony. Is there anything consistent and true or honorably about what we do in this country? I say not anymore!

Definition of Conundrum:  Something that is puzzling or confusing.

Example: “A gun is like a parachute.  If you need one, and don’t have one, you’ll probably never need one again.”  

Here are six Conundrums of socialism within America:

  1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.      
  2. 2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.      
  3. 3. They think they are victims – yet those who represent them run the government.        
  4. 4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.        
  5. 5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries can only dream about.        
  6. 6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.        
  7. And that pretty much sums up the USA in the 21st Century.   Makes you wonder who is doing the math. Whoever it is must be using Common Core Math!         
  8. The following three sentences tell you a lot about the direction of our current government and cultural environment:        
  9. 1. We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.        
  10. And here’s another one worth considering…        
  11. 2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money.  But we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money!  
  12. What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, but the second didn’t.        
  13. …and Last but not least:        
  14. 3. Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before WWII,  but we are not stopping the payments or benefits to illegal aliens.    
  15. Am I the only one missing something?

I could go on and on…

Government creates laws to restrict the rights of the people, which is not only contrary to why they were created but gives itself immunity and commits acts of corruption in the open enslaving the people they claim to serve.

We say we love our freedom but most have no idea what freedom is.

They say we are all entitled to our own opinions but every attempt is made to abolish critical thinking.

They take an oath to the constitution but those that speak of it that never took that oath are called Right wing extremists?

 

Its not only a conundrum, this is absolute lunacy!!!

 

Freeway or highway to hell?

9 June 2016
Comments Off on Freeway or highway to hell?

FREEWAY OR HIGHWAY TO HELL?
For the last few years I have been known to average about 5000 miles a month. If one could suppose that practice makes perfect, I should be an expert, passed expert or at least damn close to approaching it by now. If this mentality is true, traveling down the interstate should be no problem as I now possess the super human ability to act above the law by using my laptop as I travel down the interstate. Are some people now so impervious to human error? I doubt it.
Due to the fact that i have so much windshield time, i have found that it is when i ponder the issues the most, that is, as long as i am out of frustration the city. 
Traveling in the city in general or coming home from the open road after putting on so many miles would make anyone crazy, it does me. One would know exactly what i am talking about if one departs the city for even a short time. 
I have never been a philosopher or much else as it pertains to things of an intellectual nature but at times I often think of what things mean and what metaphorical significance they have to me. It also doesnt help that when relaying an idea i see myself as a bit metaphorically challenged. Be these things as they are, i still attempt to strive to be as perfect in my writing and thoughts as I am on the road to perfection. [joke] As with all posts I create, the point of them is never to disrespect or condemn anyone or their profession but instead to ask the questions that few seem to be asking in the hope to have positive affects on our thinking as we interact with one another. My disclaimer here is that I have many friends in law enforcement and many of them do good work and understand the concepts I desire to entertain herein.
In the following post, I will attempt to explain something I think about often but have been truly admittedly unable to articulate exactly what I mean by this post but I continue to try, maybe you can help me say what I mean to say. I do however understand that not only who we are as well as our understanding of what is and what should be have been so far diminished, that the understanding of this post will only appeal to a small population that has a better understanding of things pertaining to the principles of freedom and the proper application of law. 
Those that adhere to the media narrative that spend more time watching tv than educating themselves will either not read this or by the end, find it is not only a waste of time but will leave comments like “just shut up and pay the ticket” without understanding the blatant violation of the most fundamental right of man. I write these posts with the hope that one day I finally write exactly what I mean to write and it is understood as such. At this point, it is still like beating my head against the wall wishing I had paid more attention in English class.
Have you ever wondered about the word free? Is this word important? Does it denote any paricular significance when we use it, no matter how it is used or defined or is it another one of those words that is as subjective as everything else seems to be today when the word free to most people really equates to something quite the opposite. In other words they possess the slave mentality without even knowing it.
For example, What does “freeway” mean and what metaphorical significance does it have to what words mean? Free may be considered something at no cost, or perhaps, pertaining to freedom, free coming at a cost or sacrifice. The difference being the basic understanding that one costing something and the other perceived to cost nothing. The latter is only an ignorant view because nothing is free and all things come at a cost, right?
Freedom, as I understand it, is the ability to do things without restraint, and while I’m at it, I believe Liberty is freedom plus morality or the ability to govern oneself according to the moral principles using personal responsibility that should be consistent with America’s rule of law.
I view the word Freeway, for example, as to ability to travel freely, unrestricted in liberty meaning to do so in that i do not endanger others. Is it free and if it isn’t, what was or is the cost?
Is the freeway free when the multitudes attempt to restrain or restrict another’s ability to travel? Are the multitudes that block traffic promoting freedom or inhibiting it? Are those that adhere to the letter of the law acting like slaves or free men and what about the purpose and spirit of law anyway?
We all know government is, for the most part, oppressive and always acting in contradiction to its creation and historically and consistently has a history of projecting tyranny in the name of safety without any regard to the consequences to freedom. Does government get to define what freedom and tyranny are? It would appear they do as long as we let them.
A perfect example, in my opinion, are freeways that should clearly explain how a form of government works is perfect. Without disrespect to those,, in law enforcment as many are trained to their present behaviors, Ever notice how smooth traffic runs when no cops are on the road, i see this as a pure free market, free state in a pure constitutional republic. No one is endangering another and we are free to travel as we please. The letter of the law at this point is consistent with the spirit of the law.
Enter in the growing numbers of cops on the road that like to play “sharks and minnows” or “predator and prey” when they are paid to hide from us to catch us or when they are on the freeway,teaching the people they serve a thing of two like going the exact posted speed limit that literally creates a traffic jam not to mention increasing the agitation factor as well as increasing the dangers on the road because everyone knows there are more collisions during traffic than without. 
So, in the name of safety and promoting freedom and keeping the peace, are they consistent with those principles or are they more consistent with obstructing the flow of traffic, restricting our freedom to travel,agitating the public rather than keeping the peace and using their tax payer salaries to generate money for the state at our frustration and expense? Are we really on the freeway when you feel like a minnow in shark infested waters, where you fear those that were to not only protect your freedom but keep the peace? I’m reminded of the quote “when government fears the people there is freedom, when people fear their government there is tyranny. Why then to law enforcement, even in personal covers actions and postings on social media pride themselves on the intimidation on one hand while they claim they serve the public on the other when in reality they serve the interest of the state?
What about those that drive slow in the fast lane that appear to want to control others around them? I compare this to socialism and the kenysian system than the more free market Austrian model that is more consistent with our constitutional republic.
What has happened to our country when we not only allow ourselves to be controlled and allow the government tell us how to be responsible, when they aren’t, what the law is,when they, in many instances act above it, and tell us what our rights are, when what they really mean is what privileges they allow and how free are we when the government we serve now that was to serve us can confiscate our personal belongings for their own monetary gain if we can’t prove what they take was ours? They say that they do it in the name of the War On Drugs, somehow thinking that we will allow them to obliterate the constitution they swore to uphold because if we drive nicer cars than they do, they should be able to take them, allegedly by the words of a Twin Falls country sheriff deputy in the idaho state journal today? Have they redefined the word piracy now too or perhaps legalized it and isn’t that, also a violation of the oath they took? Have we devolved into the survival of the fittest as the wealth of the tax payer is depleted, resulting in their looking for crafty ways to make up for the shortage in tax payer funding? Will all of our freedom be obliterated as they intend to use any and all means to grow both in size and control shrinking the people to nothing more than slaves for the state? Why is no one even asking the question? 
Freeways today are a perfect example of our present form of government. If we viewed the problems in our country like we see them on the road, we may be more successful in solving them.
There is nothing free about the freeway because nothing about them is free, alot like America today. Even the assets seized by law enforcement. Although it would appear they received such goods for free, there was still a cost, this time to the people without any legal remedy as they have locked up the judiciary with the same totalitarian ideologies that permeate every branch of government.
If the freeway was a pure democracy, like many people think America is, and the majority did rule, has not the majority spoken when it comes to their RIGHT to travel when the median speed on the interstate is consistently 10-15mph over the posted limit as people enjoy their freedom and no one is even remotely injured except the feelings of the oppressive state that feels that people never possessed rights but instead only government authorized privileges?
Like our country, The freeway is either free or it’s not, it can’t be both, maybe as we opt for the government to tell us what our rights are as they continue to define what our rights are and they tell us what the law is without the the basic understanding themselves, they can act consistent with the tyranny they historically impose and call the once known “freeway” as the “highway to hell” because if the freeway is truly consistent with the form of government we experience today, I think it is quite apropos.
As I look back at another attempt to make what I believe to be a very important point, I’m still not sure it is what I hoped it would have been, all I know is a few of you will understand my point and may rewrite the post and share it to the point where the point I have made can not only be better understood but that we can take back the freedom we’ve lost.

Idaho Fascist, Crony-Capitalism and the refugees

25 May 2016
Comments Off on Idaho Fascist, Crony-Capitalism and the refugees

YOU SHOULD READ THIS…
Idaho Fascist, Crony-Capitalism and the refugees
Is there a state constitutional provision that outlines the duty of our government to create jobs as its main duty or even a duty at all? Is there any provision that allows the state governments to create endless new agencies that only make accountability more difficult? Is there anything in our state law that says that our government should control private business or help corporations with tax dollars choosing winners and losers? If you are wondering, the answer, as far as I can tell is no to every instance of what is stated above.

If there are no provisions that allow government to do what it does, is this government legitimate and if it isn’t, should it be funded? If it forces the tax payers that it claims to serve to fund their existence as it operates according to principles that are diametrically opposed to why governments were created, would this be and should this be considered as coercive extortion and furthermore do not the tax payers have the lawful right to resist? If they are told they don’t have that right, who told them so? The very government that needs that money to sustain itself and at what point is this not a conflict of interest as the two entities, the government and the tax payer fight to survive? Who wins in the end, government that was to serve that pillaged its people or the people that created government to protect their liberties? If there is a violation to a right, what is the lawful remedy, will government determine that too?

You would have to be blind not to see the depths of the corruption, the wasteful spending, the gross miss-appropriation of funds, the lack of transparency, the lies and the deceptions perpetrated on the American tax payer and even that of the people of Idaho “as the most conservative state in the union.”

As government has grown so large and has become so toxic and expensive and oppressive, do you suppose the right hand knows what the left hand is doing? To answer this question, is a double edged sword, if the answer is yes, one could conclude they are willingly corrupt and know it and if the answer is no, it shows the ineptitude of a government that has no problem writing and enforcing laws that oppress the tax payer but find some way to exempt themselves from the laws that should be binding on them thatmthey think no longer exists as they speak all about freedom and limited constitutional government every year persuading the tax payer to vote for them once again only to be duped by those that swore to protect you.

I am sure each one of us have personal stories we could share relating to this issue and we can also point out many others but I wanted to share with you a bit about something I just found out relating to our local government and the refugees to add to those instances we call know all too well. My point in writing this is in hopes that people will really begin to see a pattern of abuse, then educate ourselves on these abuses and how they do or don’t correlate with our rule of law and then demand it stop! Where they really get us is how they bury us in complexities and shady back room deals, then when we question these things we are looked at as if we are stupid, which I hate!

Are you aware of the influx of refugees to this country? Are you aware of its many tentacles and how they will affect you? Would you care if you did, or do you think you should have the right to know and then choose for yourself if you should care or not? Don’t worry, the government, in its appetite to serve would love nothing more than for you to allow it to do what it thinks is good for you, in reality is really only good for those that get paid off in some way.

America has been known throughout our history to be the beacon of hope to all nations, to bring them their tired and weary, to come here and find rest from the oppression from other nations so they can be free, sounds good right? Sure it is!

If you also read your history you will also know that there have been dark coordinated conspiracies to undermine what America is using every word and spirit of our laws against us to destroy us, did you know that? If one looks, they don’t have to look very far to see that anything that was ever implemented and sold to the people as a good thing was sold that way for quite a different purpose…to bring us down.

We were a Christian nation, a benevolent nation that was always there when other nations needed us, even if they hated us. When someone was hurting, we were there and today, it is no different, except for the exception of our once honorably perceived Samaritan nature that now creates more problems than it fixes by overthrowing governments, installing new regimes and destroying these nations, only to spend tax dollars on allegedly rebuilding them creating a refugee crisis so big, one would have to assume we are either stupid or we are intentionally creating not only the displacement of foreign citizens but increasing animosity with those we interacted with. Has anyone ever thought of the possibility that our interventionist policies, that are unconstitutional by the way, will have consequences when the chickens come home to roost or was this the plan all along to multiculturalize America in an effort to relive the Balkanization of yet another empire to where no one agrees on anything and the division is so extreme, a family cannot agree on what to have for dinner?

As I have clearly been all over the board so far, before I stray once again, I feel I must get to the point that really confirms just about everything I have stated above.

Many cities across the nation are either dealing with in influx of refugees or are getting ready to receive them. Do you know where they are receiving them from or by whom?

If America is a sovereign nation built on a confederation of sovereign states, it makes sense to note that the states created the federal government, not the other way around. As both are sovereign, this would clearly mean that the federal government and the states are in control, not controlled.

If the refugees are coming here, are the people or the states asking for them? Is the federal government asking for them? The answer is no! If the people, the states and the feds are not asking for them, why are we getting them and are we getting them by force? The answer is yes. Why? Money, among other things, and the Socialistic equal distribution of the global poor and to ultimately collapse America and all that we ever were and by force under his excellency, the United Nations and the Global commissioner refugee czar Antonio Gutierrez (UNHCR) that feels he has the power to mandate not only the people to allow the refugees but force the federal government and the states, stating and mandating how many we must take, spouting we are “racist” if we don’t? Who the hell is this weasel?

So here we have Antonio Gutierrez, some guy from some distant country in some position in some foreign illegitimate government that is forcing his will on the countries across the globe? Is there some kind of provision in our constitution or some clause that has been usurped or mal-defined to think that a sovereign nation or sovereign states must submit to a surpra-national governing entity?

Bring it home…Idaho, Twin Falls, Idaho, to be exact and considered by those that understand to be under siege and chastised by those without a clue as right wing racist biggots. Now that’s a big surprise that is until time tells the truth about what is transpiring.

I heard on a radio show the other day, the talk show host talking about how lucky Twin Falls is because of the new job opportunities coming to town and the large sums of money being invented here by wealthy corporate investors, to the tune of 100M dollars, wow! Sounds awesome! Is someone’s spidey-senses going off yet? Any red flags or maybe even a yellow one? In today’s America is it possible that there is such good news or is it another rotten package sold once again to the naïve tax payers as Nirvana? I believe the latter to be true.

Although I must admit up front that I am not a financial genius or economist, much less a brilliant writer as one can plainly see, I still feel relatively qualified to write on the topic, if for no other reason because I am involved in my form of government and have taken the time to understand what the proper role of government looks like and, well, what it doesn’t.

Twin Falls has recently acquired two very large yogurt plants, Glanbia and Chobani… your thinking jobs for all, booming economy, etc, right? Not so fast.

Do you know how companies like this ended up here? Well, the governor, for starters has been traveling to foreign countries and apparently making agreements with other countries or shall I say perhaps dealing with companies in other countries which one could ask, isn’t that a job that the states authorized to congress? Can a governor make treaties or agreements or contracts with foreign companies or governments considering most countries these days are embedded in some way in controlling those companies? What is the governor’s obsession with creating jobs anyway, wasn’t the job of government to get out of the way and allow the people to create their own wealth?

I have it on good authority that companies come here because they are wined and dined and urged and God knows what else to come here. One selling point to large companies is profit, of course many large corporations are leaving the US due to oppressive environmental regulations and the largest corporate tax rate in the world and yet, some come here under those conditions? Why on Earth would they come her under such conditions unless there were concessions? How about cheap labor? We all know the overseas corporations are there for the cheap labor so why are they here? What about the refugees? Ahh, the refugees, of course, a source of cheap labor but that’s not all!

When the refugees come here, they are very quickly cleared as able-bodied workers, capable of making minimum wage, whether they are good workers or not is irrelevant, part of the agreement as the government accepts these refugees is to put them to work. What the government doesn’t tell you is they are tax payer subsidized salaries of the refugees from 6-8 months! What happens after the money runs out? The corporations fire the employees and get new ones and the cycle begins all over again! Can you hear the giant sucking sound out of your wallet? The corporations when they hire the refugees not only get free labor on the back of the taxpayer, they were subsidized to the tune of allegedly 35 million dollars to come here. Did I tell you that these two companies specifically are allegedly Muslim owned and could it be a well-orchestrated plan to force the states to accept refugees on one side of the coin while the Muslim owned companies didn’t come here to offer Americans jobs, that sold it as it that were the case but to be the receiver of their own Muslim brothers?

What about the connection of the refugee program to the local tax payer subsidized community college? Does the College Board play a role in this and why and how did they get the power and authority to deal with refugees and do they stand to gain financially from receiving them?

Well, as you know many issues today, in an effort to confuse, they are purposely made complicated so that the people attempting to understand will shake their head in confusion so the scheme can continue and their plan works brilliantly even for me as I am still missing quite a few pieces as I tend to try to focus on too many things at one time so some of the details are still unclear. 
What I’ll tell you is that my attendance at the College board meeting was enough for me to see all my warning flags go up and after my three minutes bullet pointing the issues with not only the program but the power and authority that the college possessed, I saw this as blatant acts of treason, or at the very least the exercise of unlawful power not lawfully delegated to a bureaucracy that benefits financially which should be considered at the very least a conflict of interest as it extorts the freedom of the people and the using of their tax dollars to acquire the power they never lawfully had. The last comment suffice it to say, said it all, when they stated publically “we sure stand to gain a lot of money from supporting the program.” So there you have it, a community college, created for the community, paid for by the tax payers has worked a deal with God knows who, the Governor? The UN commissioner, Antonio Gutierrez or the powerful corporate heads? 

Did I mention that the college gets financial incentives for putting refugees to work? Did I mention that the colleges, although the employer finds the hired help worthless, coerces the private business to keep the refugees hired so they can get their incentives and even stating to “just give em a magazine?” It is one thing to have the government control private business, but it is quite something else to have a college have any control or influence on such businesses!

Are you asking what the hell is happening to this country yet? What branch of government is the UN to America and what branch of government is the community college? How does either one have any authority to rule or make laws that apply to any state or person, especially when such policies and rules violate our rule of law that is all but destroyed anyway!

So, you may hear that Twin Falls is booming and you may be jealous of the corporations moving to Twin as our government sings high praises to nailing your rule of law to the tombstone of Liberty, but they all have money to be made at your expense!

So, all things considered, shall we welcome every on and anyone into our country and allow the government to use our money for infrastructure to tend to their needs as our infrastructure crumbles? Are the influx of large corporations good for Idaho and are they offering to make up the shortfalls in infrastructure spending or just making profits? What is “Good for Idaho?” That depends on who or what you define Idaho to be: the tax paying people of the state or the state run private corporation that uses you to feed itself benefitting only itself at your expense!

What if I were a weatherman?

20 May 2016
Comments Off on What if I were a weatherman?

Once the greatest country in the world, a miracle for all eyes to see, now the blistering pustule and rotting decay of humanity is shown in the face of every American , either by those that recognize and are dismayed it or those, the willingly ignorant that defiantly, at all costs support it. The upcoming generation that will, if not intervened, have no problem calling for public hangings or guillotines, publicly displayed, rolling heads for those that are the dissenting minority, like you and I. Make no mistake, they will call for your head and from the looks of it, it won’t be long!

When did we become a country where we could no longer talk to each other and ask opinions of one another without being threatened by the fact that because they were challenged, they lash out screaming “rape” or in my case “I’m offended and you have burst my privacy bubble?” What the hell is that anyway?

I walked into the gym this morning and I remembered something about this lobotomistic executive decree about transgender bathrooms when I saw a sign related to policy on who can go where, and thought I would ask a few questions. Sometimes I get a wild hair to challenge where people are in their thinking. Although people may think it is not the place, I would ask why, when it was nothing more than a question and I had a captive audience and that the sign by the bathroom was brought in and should be discussed.

I saw a woman on a treadmill and walked up and asked her if I could ask her a question, she agreed. I asked her if it would be okay if I went into her bathroom and she had a horrified look on her face which was what I hoped for indicating she was not brainwashed by college propaganda. When she asked why, I said I just either felt like it, or as a “gender fluid” person I wanted to know if she took issue with it. She appeared pretty disturbed thinking I may be a perv and She stated she was okay with transgender’s in her bathroom.

To calm her fears, I said I am not a perv or one that would desire to abuse her privacy rights and…then she interrupted me and said “Transgender people are not rapists and sexual deviates!” to which I asked how she would know? How would she even know I was a man in a woman’s body or a woman in a man’s body much less my sexual depravities if I had them.

Unable to answer she answered in lock step with the marshmallow generation and stated I was making her feel uncomfortable and I was in her space, “her privacy bubble” and I said, well if you are uncomfortable by me merely asking you a question about such an act now, you haven’t seen anything yet as what I am saying will quickly move much higher on your list of concerns when the unlawful executive decree becomes “law.” I also, of course thanked her for giving me the answer I was looking for in full Orwellian Doublespeak, in that she is not offended by transgender’s not being a threat and fully undermining law as much as she was me asking her a question from the distance of the company placed neighboring treadmill that was no more of an invasion of privacy than it would be, should I in the next lane on the freeway or two carts in a grocery line.

I have never desired to offend anyone, I never have, but someone has to shine the light on the truth or this generation will live in the darkness of bondage. I do this even as it is seen as odd because I love people, my kids and our country and want them to think about the decisions they are making as well as the horrific consequences that come with such support of ignorant decisions.

What I realized today is just how easy someone can get arrested for saying something that bothers someone else without even the intention of committing a crime, not even considering  the violation of due process of law which these kids and most adults today, including government officials and law enforcement have no clue about because they were never taught American constitutionalism, they were taught  Marxism and Darwinism which they can’t even understand were ideologies followed by tyrants and they still follow these ideologies “in the name of freedom” which makes it even worse.

After our little discussion, and as I was walking away as she asked me to, I was met by John, “everyone’s favorite Trainer.” John is a good guy and loved by all, even me. I could see he was angry with me so I asked him what was up. He stated that I needed to leave people alone in the gym. Perplexed I said, “what? “He said I needed to leave people alone when they are working out. I thought to myself why that would apply to me and no one else. Surely as an ex-law enforcement officer he would have a basic understanding of law. He said I offended those girls to which I attempted to explain the reasoning behind my dialogue and he wouldn’t have any of it. I even told him I asked if I could ask them a question and they agreed. He repeatedly said to leave them alone and that he had never seen me like this and that the gym is not the place for such dialogue. Not only did I ask him I never knew there was policy on proper dialogue and who and when, but I pointed downstairs and told him the sign downstairs brought it into the gym and I simply wanted to bring the issue to the attention of the women and that they should be concerned.

He then angrily said he didn’t want to talk to me and I said he was free to leave because he came up to me. He walked away agitated. After a few minutes I stopped him again, and told him I never intend on upsetting or offending people and I certainly didn’t want to upset John, a man I consider my friend. I explained the reasoning behind what I did and apologized what had happened and happened that way but I told him if we do not start looking at this issue for what it is and what it will do and we are not proactive, dealing with me will be welcomed compared to what is coming!

I realized, people are in a bubble but it is in no way private. In a world that says it enjoys its privacy and in a world where a government was created to protect that privacy, just the opposite is happening, and quite consistent with everything we do as our words do not match our actions and neither does that of government.

There must be a people to challenge the status quo, there must be a people that will stand and call out the hypocrisy and there must be a people that declare the looming dangers ahead in this orchestrated decay of humanity and well, if no one else will, I certainly have my work cut out for me.

There is no “good time” for bad weather, when it comes, it affects everyone and people trust the weatherman. He is never chastised or called a liar because they understand he is there to warn the people on potential dangers. The sad part is that from what I see, what we face in our declining nation, it is far worse than bad weather and people won’t have any of it! If I were a weatherman, they would all be swept away in the fllod and quite possibly will be as blood will eventually fill the streets with chaos!

Shame on you Rep. Hartgen

11 May 2016
Comments Off on Shame on you Rep. Hartgen

It’s late, I’m still fuming. I counted to ten, then 100 then did a video explaining what happened tonight at the Twin Falls central committee. In full disclosure, I felt you should know in case something happens. It’s nothing serious against me, it’s more the travesty against the people of Twin Falls and the lies that people and elected “officials”  say and they go unchallenged. Sometimes I think God puts me in these places to say what needs to be said when others are either too scared or don’t know any better. I will say I had no intention on speaking at all. I didn’t go there with ulterior motives or to subvert, the decision to speak came when lies against liberty lovers, by name, without them being present and liberty organizations were slandered in a public forum. I could not or would not allow this to continue. Stay tuned if I can upload the darn thing from my hotel room with crappy internet
The video once uploaded is titled “shame on your Rep. Hartgen! Maybe you will like the video enough to share and I didn’t even cover the whole story. I’m not sure what will become of my attendence there last night, I’m sure I’ll suffer some backlash if I do, understand that any backlash against me will be met head on with vocal rebuke and public challenge exposing the lies of a mean, angry man that will openly lie, disrespect his opponent, embarrass his central committee and disgrace the office he holds and the legislature for behavior unbecoming or such an office! If he lies then asks for your vote, is that someone you want in office? He is a slothful, uneducated,. ignorant and shameful man that’s actions have no place in representing the people which he clearly displayed has no qualities for!

Let me repeat….. SHAME ON YOU REP. HARTGEN!

Middleton considers LGBT brainwashing and special protection in the name of seeking title IX funding

6 May 2016
Comments Off on Middleton considers LGBT brainwashing and special protection in the name of seeking title IX funding

You asked for thoughts on the public hearing you had so, I know you were expecting them from me, so here they are. This is a short list and as you know I could have gone on but out of respect and time, I shortened it the best way I could

 

When I began writing my thoughts it began as a history going back to the Bible and scriptural references and following up through Blackstone’s Common law on the Laws of England, John Locke’s Two Treatise’s of Government and ending up with eh intent of our founding fathers and their understanding of the moral and religious necessity for our constitution to work based upon the Laws and nature and Nature’s God. It is because I know you probably already have this understanding that it has been omitted not because it is not important. As a matter of fact, in order for this country to ever regain its prosperity, these principles are critical not only in the foundation of our law but in perpetuating it.

 

First off, I would like to state that the entire purpose of public school was to perpetuate morality with the understanding of Scriptures, and today somehow people think it’s ok that they can teach anything else but what it was created for that, as we can see, has only done more to harm society than to preserve that culture that our founders had envisioned.

 

The rest are questions and thoughts in the form of bullet points. Should you desire something a bit more in detail, please let me know.

 

Anyone with even a remote grasp of our heritage understands that something is seriously wrong. The problem is that there are way too few people that understand our heritage and fewer even care. What is happening today? Who is making these changes and why and what do these changes mean for future generations and how have they deviated from what was intended.

 

It is said that America was founded upon religious freedom and some will tell you, like the civil war was allegedly about slaves, it wasn’t really religious freedom as much as it was an escape from tyranny just as much as the civil war was not about slaves but about federal tyranny on the states.

 

The foundations of America began way before the Declaration and Constitution, some say the foundations began with the Bible, The Articles of Confederation and some say it went back to the Charter of 1100. In either case, it can be agreed by men that British, Germanic Anglo Saxon History was a crucial element in the formation of our republic.

 

Today, you will hear many say that God was not a part of our history and is not in any of our documents but what they are telling you is that they have not done their homework about the truth of the matter or have been deceived.

 

 

All of these documents that have been the cornerstones of American liberty have several things in common, one they all acknowledge God As the Creator, they all thank and seek his favor and they all deal with the understanding of the history of tyrannical governments and clearly define the laws of Nature and natures God are the basis of all good government meaning that the laws of men will always lead to despotism. Knowing these simple facts it sets a clear path separating the lies, and confusion of what is being perpetrated as the truth when quite the opposite is true.

 

I think it was Benjamin Franklin that said it best when he stated that “those that do not know where they have been have no idea where they are going,” If we knew where we came from and why, would that help us to know where we are going?

 

Was God really no part of freedom and liberty in America as the Atheists say or what the public school teaches? If there was no God, why were our founding documents filled with such reverence? What about Rights, where did they come from and who was to protect them? What happens if our rights are violated and how would we know? The truth is to look back to look ahead.

 

If Anglo-Saxon governments have acknowledged God for five hundred years before America’s first documents were drawn up and our documents were based on those previous documents including God in every preamble of every constitution of every state in the union, how and when did God no longer become part of our government and if God was the giver of all rights, and God no longer exists, who got rid of him and why?

 

This question would be hard for people to answer had they not looked back to see the present or the future.

 

The fact is that God didn’t go anywhere, man, in his ability to deny or cover his sin, as he did in the Garden of Eden was to not be accountable for such sins and man, in the form of government, has only made such a thing clearer to see. What’s more, government, because it is run by evil men and in their desire to control others took control through regulation to force submission to their oppressive edicts and one great way they did this was redefining the language of the people to use it to gain more power to use against them to remain in control.

 

You see, this is why understanding of history is so important, because we can then look back and see the abuses and begin to recognize them as they return. If we had no concept of the evil nature of man as an individual or man, in his collective as government and the history government oppression we would have no way to recognize it. This is why our documents were written as declarations and compacts that we clearly understood by all as the standard. Without that standard, what is to become of a society?

If we knew now what we knew then what should we know?

 

There is more than enough evidence to understand that God existed and was acknowledged by man for hundreds of years. They also understood that seeking his favor brought blessings upon those seeking. They understood that Rights were given by a Creator and as the most Supreme Being and the superior, no man, as an inferior had any authority under a god to take rights away, these called Unalienable rights. 

 

If the people acknowledged God and his creation, and his rights granted to men, they also understood The Laws of Nature and Natures God and these were the foundations of law even before such laws and declarations written by men. They understood that the laws and nature and natures God was the supreme law of the land. 

 

God in granting his freedom to men, gave them dominion over the earth and to subdue it, in this he allowed for the creation of man’s law to fill areas not clearly outlined in God’s law and were entrusted to make laws that were consistent with it, not to go against them.

 

For many years man lived free and prosperous and it wasn’t until man’s law began contradicting Gods law where we started getting into trouble. Man, in his evil and fallen nature as in times before have always tried to deny God and become gods unto themselves and as many times as we have found ourselves in captivity, we still refuse to learn from our mistakes but all the while begging God for forgiveness.

 

Today, things are no different, we pray to God, but either don’t read his word or we prefer to make it upon our own or we simply deny he exists in an effort to deny any accountability and thinking that government is somehow God and if we can get government accept our sins, accountability would be a thing of the past and anyone that dare bring it up, becomes the enemy, as defined by the government that once it gains a bit of power swears it won’t be used against the people that fly’s in the face of history.

 

Although, I could go many places with the beginning of this writing, I prefer to target a specific area dealing with man’s ability to think he can change what God has created forgetting that what God has made crooked, no man can make straight.

 

As I continue to try to make sense of all this and as I post my thoughts, my purpose isn’t to purposely agitate others but rather just to consider my perspective and compare it to the perspective of the indivisible reading it that may not be thinking as deeply on the topic, or even to begin to open dialogue to discuss the unintended consequences of such decisions.

 

BIBLICAL AND FAMILY RELATED AND COMMON SENSE

 

  • Are policies that violate the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God merely man, as he historically attempts to abandon God and his laws becoming Gods unto themselves? Can humans now genetically create species or change a species from its origin to something else? Can man deny the truth of his existence than by living that lie, believe he is something else or it is merely living a lie?

 

  • Where did man get the idea that he created as either male or female, has the ability to change his gender? And furthermore when did parents allow for their children to choose what sex they want to be at the same age that most parents don’t allow them to choose what to have for dinner much less, how to dress or what kind of music they can listen to?

 

  • After all if we truly “love” one another, we should be willing to point out to one another the possible dangers that our brothers and sisters and future generations may fall under for the ignorant and hasty decisions we made with what could be catastrophic consequences.

 

  • Can a man or woman, father or mother or son or daughter really choose their gender when scientifically; it is determined by the XY chromosome? Is this man denying Gods will and creation and man becoming God unto himself?

 

  • Shall a parent without wisdom direct his child in a decision that will harm that child and is it not in some fashion considered child abuse as defined by government?

 

  • Shall a child that knows nothing of life also lacking in that wisdom be able to choose a path that is harmful to them and shall that responsibility not fall upon the parent, in in today’s nanny state, the government as it desires to unlawfully protect us from ourselves?

 

  • Shall an  persons stated but unproven gender that claims to represent a larger group that perhaps may exist be able to  change the laws and traditions of a “conservative community” when the person, could possibly be sent on a mission to subvert an entire community by itself undermining the communities conservative values?
  • Do we realize that in California, it has become law, or school policy that a child in as early a Kindergarten, that is unable to choose the color of clothes it wants to wear, is unable to choose what to eat, what to think, feel and say and needs permission to go to the bathroom, be able to choose its own gender an does it in fact understand what it is saying when it is clearly been brainwashed to say things it doesn’t understand?

 

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

 

  • The federal constitution was written as a compact between states that created a federal government for benefit of the states. In such creation, it was authorized, by the states, “few and defined powers” with all other powers not listed left to the states and the people respectively as stated in the ninth and tenth amendments.
  • With a basic understanding of this concept, it becomes easy to understand several things, one, the states are supreme and are superior to the federal government because it was a creation of the states, meaning that the federal Constitution contrary to today’s understanding is inferior to the states except within those few and defined powers.
  • With this being said, can a federal government create a US Department of Education if it is not specifically defined in the federal Constitution? Or can the USDOE create new bureaucracies or further delegate power and authority it never lawfully possessed?
  • Can the creation of the Office of Human rights, under the USDOE give directives or give judicial opinions on policy and can they make policy that is not law somehow applicable to the people and without judicial authority?

 

  • If schools attend on passing school policy as law, when it isn’t law, what would be the Enforcement mechanism to hold people and children to such policy when it is out of the jurisdictions of the lawful application of policy as it was intended to streamline the administration in carrying out its duties?
  • How will the local SRO handle such violations of policy when it is out of his jurisdiction to enforce school policy?

 

  • Are we aware the school districts across the country are passing policy without the knowledge of the community forcing such policy upon them without representation or as much as an open meeting if such applies to the child and parents that fund the district? Pocatello District 25?

 

  • Did government ever possess the lawful ability to define man’s language, where things that were once good, become bad? Are terms like harassment, arbitrary an ambiguous only to change over time?
  • Will rape, theft and murder become lawful? You may think I’m crazy but decades ago, Sodomy was a felony and now is not only legal but protected.

 

  • What are the boundaries of what is accepted by government and how can the written law remain the standard when the law changes as soon as it is written?
  • If such change can be made so arbitrarily, is there any point in a foundational standard?
  • NAMBLA promotes activities that are illegal in writing but no one gets arrested? Sex with Children?

 

  • Is not the special treatment of one class over another unequal treatment when the law protect one class against another and is this not a form of segregation? If transgender bathrooms become a  reality, is this not re-establishing black bathroms? Shall we also have special drinking fountains and more?

 

 

IF THESE ARE THE SIGN OF THE TIMES, IN THE NAME OF EQUALITY I DEMAND THE FOLLOWING:

 

I want equal protection under the law from my government labeling me an “extremist Terrorist,” I want the IRS and other unconstitutional agencies to cease   and desist in character assassinations of those God fearing, America loving patriots.

 

I want Constitutional clubs on campus and I demand that any use of freedom of speech is not only restricted in some way, I want my freedom of speech to be guaranteed along with my religious liberty in accordance with the law as it is consistent with not only he federal but he state constitutions.

 

If the state constitution guarantees religious liberty and freedom of speech or freedom of moral conscience, how can these principles be protected when any speech or belief against such a policy violates every one of those protections?

 

 

 

 

CONTRACT LAW

 

  • In Article 9, section 1 of the state constitution, it states that t moral integrity of a state is dependent upon he intelligence of the people, is it an intelligent move to not consider a long list of negatives regarding sexual deviancy and allowing children to decide what is offensive and what isn’t as it undermines decades or centuries of mora traditions?

 

  • If a contract written between two people that authorized both liberties and limitations on what the two were able to do, would it be lawful for one to expand or more restrict beyond the contract? It is a well know maxim of law that if on part of the contract is violated, the entire contract is null. If a state constitution is a contract between the people and the government, or an agreement on the liberties and limitations on government authority, did such agreement allow for unlimited power and authority to accept anything it wants?ConclusionIs this really for the good of the child or once again about federal money that will only and has already shackled the generation we say we love and care about?Is it not clear to see this is not only a violation of federal law, state law but an obliteration of sovereignty as this is a directive under the UN mandates for social justice? If you say you love America, why would you support international law?What part of the coercive tactics authorizes my tax dollars to fund something that is in complete opposition to not only my moral but religious liberty and will ultimately lead to my opposition that leads to the loss of my personal property of I resist through the failure to pay my taxes?Are you telling me that if you pass this policy, that is not law, and I resist that somehow there will be legal ramifications and consequences that destroy my guaranteed right to protection of LIFE, LIBERTY and personal PROPERTY?I not only oppose any acceptance of this UN mandated, protection of sexual deviancy and ridiculous bullying rhetoric policy, I adamantly oppose it and any attempt to restrict my freedom of speech on this issue or my moral and religious conscience or coercive attempts to hold my personal property hostage in support of the Marxist brainwashing of myself or children, will be met with equal and opposite force!Respectfully,Tom Munds
  • 208-861-6405

Who are the Watchmen on the Wall?

8 April 2016
Comments Off on Who are the Watchmen on the Wall?

Who are the watchmen on the wall?

Why do so many Americans support the public school system? Do they not understand what the system is doing to our kids and their future? Why are the facts being ignored when so many people see so many problems in our country? Are people more interested in the now than they are for the future of their kids? Why can’t they see that they are part of the problem? Why aren’t they looking what is being taught in school? Do parents not understand because they were also brainwashed by the same system?

If you are a supporter, please explain where I am mistaken. If we were to look at the Communist Manifesto and the Bill of Rights, for example, please tell me why this not a viable comparison.

If our job as parents were to help safeguard Liberty for future generations but we have no concept or care what Liberty means, sure your kids will become “educated” and “protected” while they are in school but what will life be like for them once they graduate?

Our children, in complete contradiction to what you have been led to believe are not better educated, even though we throw more money at the system than we ever have. Is anyone asking why this is? Our kids have become softer and less able to function in difficult environments because they have been coddled where the parent rather than sparing the rod and telling their kids what to do are telling their parents what to do so the role between parent and child is reversed without the necessary wisdom, to function properly in society. The bottom line is that our kids are ill equipped to function in the real world, which would probably explain why Cyberbullying and the suicide rate are so high and why kids are so emotionally taxed when someone is in mere disagreement with them. These issues have only complicated but contorted the law and are, quite frankly unlawful laws.

If you are a school supporter, do you support it blindly and ignorantly assuming what I am saying is wrong? What if I’m not? Do you have what it takes to change what you see?

Leaders like Hitler and others have proclaimed the need to get control of our children to change the world into a place that Hitler wanted and ironically, as we know Hitler to be a bad man, we continue to fulfill his desires through the public school teaching his principles “in the name of freedom” and “for the sake of our children” which is also what Hitler said.

If you haven’t already, please read the Manifestos below and ask yourself what you are funding and what that is doing to your kids and ask yourself if this could be why we are having so many problems in society today. Also ask yourself if you are willing to destroy the Amendments, like the freedom of speech, “for the sake of the child’s feeling” today sacrificing without knowledge of the unintended consequences of such a thing in their future after you are long gone.

One other thing to consider if you are not a supporter is that constitutions were documents that limited powers of government so that people would be able to spot their overreach. If the school was originally created to perpetuate Christian principles to keep society moral and happy, would it not be a violation of such a constitution when they teach the exact opposite? If it was a contract and we viewed it through the eyes of contract law, if I promised you to teach them mechanical engineering and I taught them basket weaving, is it not a violation of that contract? And according to contract law, if one provision has been violated does it not void the entire contract? If it does, does this exempt us from that contract? If you don’t think so, I’d love to hear why.

So, while many well intentioned people flock to support public school and promote communist  worldviews to our kids, who are the watchmen on the wall protecting their freedom and safeguarding their liberty? Why are people so focused on “what they are learning” now, when in reality the foundational purpose of the school was to teach our kids the exact opposite of what they are being taught today?

Are you one that says you love your kids and your country while you support public school? If so, why are you destroying the future of both?

Its time to wake up and attend your local school board, join with others studying the issues and looking at how they are all connected. If you can separate your heart and emotion from the brain and see with your own mind what is happening, you cannot possibly deny what I’ve stated. If you truly care about your children, you should care more about their future and their freedom than you would in support of a system that is corrupting the minds of your babes.

 

 

Here are the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto:

  1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes. Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)
  2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”.
  3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.
  4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc…).
  5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.
  6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State. Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.
  7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read “controlled or subsidized” rather than “owned”… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
  8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.
  9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country. Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.
  10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. Americans are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, but are actually “government force-tax-funded schools ” Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like “majority rules”, and “pay your fair share”. WHERE are the words “fair share” in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is “fair share” even suggested !! The philosophical concept of “fair share” comes from the Communist maxim, “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. … America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC .

 Here are the Bill of Rights:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

————————————————————————

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

————————————————————————

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

————————————————————————

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

————————————————————————

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

————————————————————————

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

————————————————————————

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

————————————————————————

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

————————————————————————

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

————————————————————————

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

————————————————————————

 

 

 

“Conservative” Gov. Otter vetoes bill “authorizing” Bible in School

6 April 2016
Comments Off on “Conservative” Gov. Otter vetoes bill “authorizing” Bible in School

 

“Conservative” Gov. Otter vetoes bill “authorizing” Bible in School

Feel free to read my post on the issue below or watch the videos:

 

The first question you should be asking is What if he is wrong? The next question is with all of the gross positions our governor has taken over the years is: How does Otter define “conservatism? Next, as a “man of faith” that apparently goes to church more often than not, the next question would be does this make him a hypocrite for a man that not only espouses the principles of the constitution and Rights coming from a Creator as he is standing before God as he vetoes such a bill? I ask myself, would I be honoring God as I deny him in a public square that enslaves children to the “the state” as God, rather that Jesus Christ himself? If I were the Father and he was my son, at this moment, I am remembering the story of Peter denying God as the rooster crows three times, but what is worse are the consequences for those that look to him as a leader. Did he make the right decision in the name of tolerance scared of being sued?

One thought for many that actually support the Bible in school is not allowing it at all thinking that other religions will want equal time. Do these people realize that religion is defined as a belief and that if Christianity is not taught; some other belief will take its place? Have we not seen this already as our public school system is the state authorized brainwashing for subservient slaves for a global government?

Otter was a student with Cleon Skousen on the constitution and its founding principles, which means he knows better than to make decisions like these because he now, with the knowledge he possesses is willingly misleading the people he claims to serve. Do you think he doesn’t realize the importance of the value of the Bible in our culture? Do you think he doesn’t know that our founders desired the Bible being taught in school because it was the foundation of a moral and religious and a free people? Do you think he knew that the founders actually meant the free common school was specifically in place to teach the Bible for that reason? Sure he does, so why did he make such a decision?

What about our state constitution and the state statutes that clearly either insinuate or flat our state in writing that the Bible shall be taught in school? How does his veto affect those? Shall it be like the constitutional amendment that was struck down by an unconstitutional decision by the Supreme Court as if they are the final arbiters of the rights of man and the state? How clueless is he or who bought him off? And when calling the governors office they state the reason he vetoed it was because Idaho’s constitution in Article 9, section 6 says that religious text shall not be taught in school? If he read this provision in the proper context, why doe the rest of the constitution including the preamble acknowledge God and how can we thank God in the beginning of the constitution and deny him where it matters most?

Do people not recognize the consequences of the ignorant choices we make? Can they not see and do they not complain about our immoral nature as our empire falls due to tremendous debt, deception, corruption, tyranny, lack of ethics, the emptiness of the once beloved principle of the land of brotherly love now as neighbors are looking for any way to rip each other’s head off? What about the fact that the people, one hand as they claim they are free, as they opt to give up their freedom for security on the other needing more laws that only seem to make us more lawless?

America is no longer free nor are we brave, we are sick and dying and so is our nation, we are the land of the pharmaceuticals, hospitals and attorneys, does this not tell you what we have become?

Did you know hospitals were religious institutions? Shall we ban God from them too? Why are Bibles allowed in Prison but not in public school when prison and public school are almost identical? Wouldn’t it seem to you that this is all just a well-orchestrated plan to incarcerate all of humanity and why wouldn’t you see it this way? If our children are not taught a moral standard of ethics and law and live in a random relative understanding that there is no standard and we make it up as we go along but government increases its power to undermine such standards and they make money on the percentage of those incarcerated, doesn’t it make sense that they benefit from not teaching a standard then incarcerate people for not adhering to the law they happened to create that day?

As for the separation of church and state, don’t get me started. Ask yourself one question…Are we not worse today as a nation than we have ever been and if you look back at who we were, have we not changed for the worse and not the better and can a correlation be made to the simple fact that we don’t know our history, we have no foundation and we are but sheep led to the slaughter?

What about Rights? I hear people that don’t think the Bible should be in school, what does that say about your rights and what position does that put you in when your government lies to you? You are the master; your government is the servant! You have Un-Alienable Rights, which means they come from the Creator and can never be taken away and what’s more? The government was created to secure those rights, not to strip them from you reducing them to mere privilege!

So, as you look at this issue related to the Bible in school or anywhere in our public forum, you had better expand your periphery and understand that government wants to control every aspect of your life and will do so by brainwashing you and your children to believe that that there is no God, or that the state is god and that you have NO rights, you only have privileges that government gives you that they can take away!

Sure, the governor vetoed the Bill but does our ignorant electorate understand that the legislature can override it, or is our legislature a gross cross section of the ignorance perpetuated by the public school that it supports into law for purposed much different that for why it was created or are they perhaps as spineless as the awakened electorate to scared to stand and oppose such foolishness?

If you see the world as nothing but problems it is because people no longer think in terms of solutions, support for public schools and hospitals confirm that mentality. It’s almost as if the federal reserve produces and endless supply of Band Aids and governments job is to mask the problems either because they don’t want to fix the problems or , as well intentioned as some of them are, don’t know enough about foundational concepts including the Bible, our constitution, the Laws and Nature and Natures God and common sense to clearly see that our problems are not that complicated to solve, we just need educated and willing to care more about solutions than the endless printing of Band Aids.

If you say you love your children, care enough to look beyond yourself and think about what you support and what the consequences of what you support will mean to them/ If you are wrong, they are the ones that will suffer.

ACTION NEEDED: Gender “confusion” comes to Middleton

2 April 2016
Comments Off on ACTION NEEDED: Gender “confusion” comes to Middleton

Dear Readers,

If there was anything that enrages me more, I’m not sure I can think of it at this moment. It seems to me that All “Americans” have become so brainwashed by government propaganda, they have lost the ability to think clearly much less understand unintended consequences of their actions. Case in point, one of many issues, where they target our kids but have waited to brainwash parents to support them in their demise. It appears that Middleton, that sleepy small town of well intended people is a target town by a much grander supra-governing entity and has apparently garnered their support by accepting funding to promote global serfdom in reckless abandon of American principles while, ironically, selling them as American ideals.

Please attend these meetings and bring your mind and think critically about what this means. If your mind has been reduced to the same substance as what you excrete daily, perhaps it be better if you stayed home!

PLEASE ATTEND!!!
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 134
Middleton, Canyon County, Idaho
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the patrons of School District No. 134 that the said District is holding informational meetings regarding three new policies (future Policies #400.2-Employee Responsibilities Regarding Student Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying, #593-Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation and #594-Student Discipline).
The two meetings are to be held on Thursday, April 7, 2016 at the following times and locations:
3 – 4:30 pm – Heights Library
5 – 6:30 pm – MMS Annex A Conference room
Dated this 31st day of March, 2016
Sharla Terrill
Deputy Clerk
School District No. 134
Canyon County, Idaho Justice
Next Page »